|
Add New Posts to your Google Home Page! ![]() |
|
||||
|
any thoughts on this?
here are mine, first place didnt comply with the rules, with that much money on the line he should have hes out second place didnt score well? did he pass or fail, thats the touchy parts, if he passed according to the rules he wins, if not, on to third place. now the guy should get the money from each place, just the first place, basically disqualify the offending fish http://www.mdcoastdispatch.com/artic...cid=18&id=2181 By Shawn J. Soper, News Editor Originally published December 21, 2007 White Marlin Open organizers in September filed a complaint of interpleader, which essentially asked a Worcester County Circuit Court judge to intercede on their behalf and assess who among the top three winners in the 2007 event’s blue marlin division should be awarded the hundreds of thousands of dollars at stake. The complaint was filed after it came to light the second-place finisher did not score well on two separate polygraph tests following the tournament and the first-place finisher did not take his required polygraph test until weeks after the date and time prescribed in the tournament’s rules. As a result, the third-place finisher, angler Robert Belansen, fishing aboard the “Beast” out of Cape May, N.J., has claimed he is owed all of the prize money doled out in the category including the $667,000 awarded to the first- and second-place finishers. The first-place finisher, Carl Hurlebaus, has since filed a counter-suit against the White Marlin Open claiming he fully complied with tournament rules and successfully completed his polygraph exam, albeit not at the exact date and time prescribed in tournament rules. This week in Circuit Court, all of the parties agreed to the complaint of interpleader, allowing the case to move forward. In the agreement, the counter suit filed by Hurlebaus, through his attorney Hugh Cropper IV, will be consolidated with the original complaint, allowing Circuit Court Judge Thomas Groton to consider all of the factors in the case as one. The agreement reached on Tuesday names Belansen as the plaintiff in the action, just as it has from the beginning, and names the second-place finisher, Bill Matthews, and David Frederick, as the defendants. In the agreement reached on Tuesday, Hurlebaus is now listed as the counter-plaintiff in the case. The roughly $667,000 in question has been deposited with the Clerk of the Circuit Court’s office and will be doled out to the three winners as deemed appropriate by Groton following a settlement conference sometime early next year. Belansen weighed the first qualifying blue marlin, a 567-pounder, on the 2007 tournament’s first day and briefly took the top spot in the category. On Tuesday of White Marlin Open week, Matthews, fishing aboard the “Gale Force II,” weighed a 590-pound blue marlin, jumping into first-place in the category and knocking Belansen into second. On Thursday of the tournament, Hurlebaus hauled in a 632-pound blue marlin, knocking Matthews and Belansen down to second- and third-place, respectively. When the dust settled, the prize money totals were as follows: Hurlebaus, first place, $378,210; Matthews, second place, $289,640; and Belansen, third-place, $179,569. Belansen, through his attorney, made a formal complaint demanding the first- and second-place prize money as well because of Matthews’ alleged failure to pass the require polygraph test and the untimely taking of the test by the first-place finisher, Hurleba
__________________
---------------------------- Roger |
|
|||
|
I agree -- 1st place DQ'ed if you can't follow the rules you don't deserve the money.
2nd place -- well the polygraph is part of the rules for a reason, if you fail it your out. What would be the point of having the polygraph if people who failed where awarded money. 3rd place -- He should get the 1st place money ONLY. The next two biggest fish should get 2nd and 3rd. If this was the only qualifying fish the rest of the prize money should be given out as to the rules of the tournament. If the rules state if only one fish is caught then all three prizes go to the person then so be it. If the rules state it will be evenly distributed between all competitors then so be it, if the rules state there should be a random drawing for the money then so be it.
__________________
Jim Cambridge Maryland Click Click Click..........Fish On! |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| First white marlin of the season caught | Sam | Maryland Offshore Reports | 1 | 06-21-2007 11:06 AM |
| White Marlin | Sam | Fish Species Information | 1 | 05-08-2007 08:34 PM |
| Blue Marlin | Sam | Fish Species Information | 0 | 05-08-2007 07:05 PM |
| interesting read about white marlin | Pier_man0909 | General Fishing Chat | 0 | 03-04-2007 04:54 PM |
| White Marlin Tournament | Sam | Maryland Fishing Tournaments | 0 | 08-31-2005 06:44 PM |