|
|
|
|||
|
For those of you who don't know what the US Code is, The United States Code is the consolidation and codification by subject matter of the general and permanent laws of the United States. It is divided by broad subjects into 50 titles and published by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the U.S. House of Representatives. the website below is the US House Of Representatives.
http://uscode.house.gov/ Cape Hatteras was named and designated as "Cape Hatteras National Seashore Recreational Area" and was given the purpose "for the benefit and enjoyment of the people". IT IS NOT A WILDLIFE REFUGE OR PRESERVE! http://uscode.house.gov/uscode-cgi/f...20%20%20%20%20 areas that are adaptable to recreation shall be used as such. http://uscode.house.gov/uscode-cgi/f...20%20%20%20%20 I have said before about to get on the negotiated rulemaking committee you must promise to negotiate in good faith. you mist sign a commitment when you apply to get on the committee. I wonder why the enviros are still on the committee since they broke their commitment by not participating and taking us to court, twice. right now they are participating in their own negotiations directly with the NPS, leaving out the other 27 members of the committee. that is a breach of contract. here it is kinda far down under subsection (b) http://uscode.house.gov/uscode-cgi/f...20%20%20%20%20 what do you think? |
|
|||
|
it is total fuggin BS! what we are dealing with here is the US Joke System. just shows that he who has the money has the power. I still can't believe that we have the same judge hearing the case. He shows a complete bias imo, and seems to give them whatever they want and seems to treat our lawyers like crap. there have been articles in the paper about this judge before about "breaking ethics laws" and ruling in favor of companies he has interest in. I thought it was a law that if you have interest in a company, financial or other, you must pass up the case. apparently I am wrong or the judge is too good for the law. now it seems like he was suggesting new laws for the park. he is a judge, supposed to uphold the law, not make it. he needs to go as far as I'm concerned.
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/20...le/index1.html Last edited by Pier_man0909; 04-07-2008 at 02:38 PM. |
|
||||
|
It is unfortunate for everyone that actually cares about our precious resources.
I've seen Judges before like the one you describe. They tend to remain in office (on the bench) because of uneducated voters. They go by name recognition and not ethics. We will see what happens Friday with the case.
__________________
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| osv fight at cape point | AISURFFISH | General Fishing Discussion | 7 | 04-29-2008 12:43 PM |
| VCAN (Virginia Coastal Access Now) | Dixie719 | Virginia Inshore Fishing Forum, Pictures, Reports, Advice and techniques | 3 | 04-12-2007 07:01 AM |