I was not at the hearing today but apparently one of the first things the judge said was "I am ready to rule in favor of the injunction." the other side was apparently insisting on a continuance for negotiating. that doesnt sound good, I mean why would they turn down what they want? in my mind it is only to get more of what they want. one of the audubon represenatives said that "there will be more restrictions but it will be fair". I heard from a friend that was there that our lawyers wanted to be a part of the negotiations but are only allowed to sit at the table and listen, not participate in negotiating. I haven't confirmed that yet but thats what i heard. sounds like the other side gets anything they want. They judge will apparently make a decision next Friday. I will fill you in when I get more. |